Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (5) TMI 1015 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Sudden fight and single blow: the text explains why the act may fall under culpable homicide and why compensation must be considered. A homicidal act committed in a sudden quarrel, without premeditation, prior enmity or cruelty, and involving only a single blow with no further assault, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Sudden fight and single blow: the text explains why the act may fall under culpable homicide and why compensation must be considered.

                            A homicidal act committed in a sudden quarrel, without premeditation, prior enmity or cruelty, and involving only a single blow with no further assault, was treated as falling within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC. On those facts, the text explains that the conviction for murder under Section 302 was not sustainable, and that the proper classification was culpable homicide not amounting to murder. It also distinguishes Section 304 Part II from Part I by noting absence of intention to cause death but presence of knowledge that the act was likely to cause death. The text further states that courts must consider compensation under Section 357 CrPC and record reasons for granting or refusing it.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was liable to be altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code; (ii) Whether the facts disclosed the ingredients of Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code rather than Section 304 Part I; (iii) Whether the Courts were required to apply their mind to the question of compensation under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

                            Issue (i): Whether the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was liable to be altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code.

                            Analysis: The occurrence arose out of a sudden quarrel without premeditation. There was no prior enmity or motive, the weapon used was not lethal in the circumstances, only a single blow was inflicted, and no further assault followed after the deceased fell. These features indicated absence of cruelty or undue advantage and brought the case within the protective ambit of Exception 4 to Section 300.

                            Conclusion: The conviction under Section 302 was not sustainable and the case fell within Exception 4 to Section 300.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the facts disclosed the ingredients of Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code rather than Section 304 Part I.

                            Analysis: The Court assessed the nature of the weapon, the single blow on the head, the surrounding quarrel, and the lack of intention to cause death. While intention to kill was absent, the appellant could be attributed knowledge that the injury was likely to cause death. That distinction placed the case in the realm of knowledge rather than intention.

                            Conclusion: The offence was punishable under Section 304 Part II and not under Section 304 Part I.

                            Issue (iii): Whether the Courts were required to apply their mind to the question of compensation under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

                            Analysis: The power to award compensation is not merely ancillary. It is a power coupled with a duty, and courts are required to consider compensation in every criminal case and record reasons for granting or refusing it. The judgments below showed no consideration of this statutory duty, although remand was not considered appropriate on the facts of the case.

                            Conclusion: The duty to consider compensation under Section 357 was affirmed, but no further relief was granted on that aspect in this case.

                            Final Conclusion: The conviction was modified from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, the sentence was reduced to rigorous imprisonment for five years, and the fine and default sentence were kept unchanged. The decision also clarified that courts must consider victim compensation as part of the sentencing process.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where a homicidal act occurs in a sudden fight without premeditation, without undue advantage or cruel conduct, and the accused lacks intention to cause death but has knowledge that the act is likely to cause death, the offence falls under Section 304 Part II rather than Section 302; courts must also apply their mind to compensation in every criminal case under Section 357.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found