Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appellate court can direct payment of compensation under Section 357(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 without first affording the accused an opportunity of hearing on the question of quantum and liability.
Analysis: Section 357(1) applies where fine forms part of the sentence, while Section 357(3) creates an independent power to award compensation even where no fine is imposed, and Section 357(4) extends that power to appellate, revisional, and High Court jurisdiction. The provision is silent on procedure, but where an order may adversely affect the accused's rights and financial liability, the principles of natural justice are read into the statute unless expressly excluded. Before compensation is fixed, relevant matters such as the need for compensation, the accused's capacity to pay, and other surrounding circumstances must be considered; that inquiry cannot be made fairly without hearing the affected party.
Conclusion: An opportunity of hearing is mandatory before compensation is directed under Section 357(4) of the Code. The compensation direction made by the High Court could not stand without such hearing.
Final Conclusion: The compensation component of the High Court's order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the appellant, while the rest of the decision remained unaffected.
Ratio Decidendi: When a statute confers power to impose compensatory liability affecting substantive rights but is silent on procedure, the principles of natural justice require that the affected person be given an opportunity of hearing before the power is exercised, unless excluded by express words or necessary implication.