Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies to the search of a bag carried by a person, and whether non-compliance with that provision vitiates the recovery.
Analysis: Section 50 is confined to a personal search of a person. It does not extend to the search of a bag, suitcase or container carried by the accused, because such a search is distinct from a search of the person himself. The safeguard under Section 50 cannot be enlarged by strained interpretation so as to cover articles carried by a person when the statutory language is directed to personal search alone.
Conclusion: Section 50 was held not to apply to the search of the bag, and the contrary view of the High Court was held to be wrong.
Final Conclusion: The decision turns on the limited scope of the statutory safeguard under Section 50 and its inapplicability to recovery from a bag carried by the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The mandatory requirement of Section 50 applies only to personal search and not to the search of a bag or other article carried by the accused.