Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the protection under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was attracted when the contraband was recovered from a plastic bag lying with the accused and not from a search of his person.
Analysis: Section 50 applies only when there is a search of the person of the accused, as distinguished from a search of baggage, premises, or other receptacles. The recovery in the case was from a plastic bag found with the accused, and the finding of possession was concurrently recorded on the evidence. Since the search was not a personal search, the statutory safeguard requiring intimation of the right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer was not applicable.
Conclusion: Section 50 was not violated, and the conviction was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: The procedural safeguard under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is confined to a search of the person and does not extend to recovery from baggage or other articles not amounting to a personal search.