Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies where contraband is recovered from a bag carried by the and whether the conviction could be set aside for non-compliance with that provision.
Analysis: Section 50 protects a person subjected to personal search and requires the suspect to be clearly informed of the right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The Court distinguished between a search of the person and a search of a bag or other article carried by the person. On the evidence, the recovery was treated as having been made only from the bag carried on the shoulder, and not from the body or clothing of the accused. In that situation, the statutory safeguard under Section 50 was held not to be attracted. The Court also held that the offer of a third option to be searched before a police officer was not in conformity with Section 50, but that defect did not help the appellant because the provision itself was inapplicable to a bag search.
Conclusion: Section 50 was not applicable to the search of the bag, and the conviction under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were rejected because the recovery from the bag was legally sufficient to sustain the conviction, and the absence of compliance with Section 50 did not vitiate the prosecution case on these facts.
Ratio Decidendi: The safeguard under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is confined to personal search and does not extend to a bag or luggage carried by the accused unless the search is of the person itself.