Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applied to the search of baggage not in the accused's actual possession at the time of search, and whether non-compliance with that provision vitiated the prosecution.
Analysis: Section 50 is attracted when an authorised officer is about to search a person. The provision, read with the special safeguard in sub-section (4) regarding the search of a female by a female, shows that the statutory protection is directed to personal search and not to the search of articles lying elsewhere and later brought to the place of search. At the same time, where a handbag or similar article is being carried on the person, the search may still amount to a search of the person. On the facts, the incriminating article was found in a bag that had already been checked in, was out of the accused's reach, and was brought from the aircraft luggage compartment for examination. The search was therefore not a search of the person within the meaning of Section 50.
Conclusion: Section 50 was not attracted, and its non-compliance did not vitiate the prosecution. The petition was rightly dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies only to the search of a person, and not to the search of baggage or articles not in the accused's actual possession at the time of search.