Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2010 (10) TMI 902 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Modifies Interest Rate, Affirms TPO's Jurisdiction Over Income The Tribunal upheld the TPO's determination of additional income but modified the interest rate to 5% instead of 10.25%. The Tribunal affirmed the TPO's ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Modifies Interest Rate, Affirms TPO's Jurisdiction Over Income

                          The Tribunal upheld the TPO's determination of additional income but modified the interest rate to 5% instead of 10.25%. The Tribunal affirmed the TPO's jurisdiction over outstanding receivables and interest calculation, rejecting the assessee's challenge. The Commissioner's directions on interest income were partially approved, with the Tribunal adjusting the rate based on potential loss to the assessee in India. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue's appeal was allowed, resulting in a balanced resolution of the issues.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Determination of additional income by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).
                          2. Jurisdiction of the TPO regarding outstanding receivables and interest calculation.
                          3. Reasonableness of the directions issued by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Determination of Additional Income by the TPO:
                          The primary issue in the appeal was the additional income of Rs. 56,60,486 determined by the TPO under section 92CA of the IT Act, 1961, as an Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment. The assessee, a company engaged in software development, had reported a loss of Rs. 1,31,53,534 for the assessment year 2004-05. The TPO, after analyzing the international transactions using the Transactional Net Margin Method, accepted the pricing of transactions but found that a significant amount of Rs. 7,73,23,619 was shown as debts receivable from its AE, Homestar USA, out of which Rs. 5,52,25,261 was outstanding for more than six months. The TPO concluded that this parking of funds adversely affected the profitability of the assessee and calculated an interest income of Rs. 56,60,486 at the rate of 10.25%, which was deducted from the reported loss.

                          2. Jurisdiction of the TPO Regarding Outstanding Receivables and Interest Calculation:
                          The assessee challenged the jurisdiction of the TPO, arguing that the reference made by the Assessing Officer did not cover the aspect of delay in collecting receivables. However, the Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that the reference to the TPO is for an overall examination of international transactions, including the financial impact of outstanding receivables. The Tribunal held that the TPO had jurisdiction to examine the issue of outstanding receivables and non-charging of interest thereon, as these receivables were a financial result of international transactions with the AE.

                          3. Reasonableness of the Directions Issued by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals):
                          The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) agreed with the TPO that the outstanding receivables were akin to an interest-free loan to the AE, thereby justifying the interest income calculation. However, the Commissioner did not approve the use of the Prime Lending Rate (PLR) of the State Bank of India, suggesting instead the use of the LIBOR/US-FED rate, considering the transactions were in USD. The Commissioner also directed allowing a reasonable period for the collection of receivables and calculating interest only for the period exceeding this reasonable time.

                          The Tribunal upheld the direction to provide a reasonable interest-free period but vacated the directions regarding the nature of the loan and the use of the LIBOR/US-FED rate. The Tribunal reasoned that the ALP factor should be based on the potential loss suffered by the assessee in India, not the benefit to the AE in the USA. Consequently, the Tribunal found it appropriate to adopt a reasonable rate applicable to short-term deposits instead of the PLR rate. The Tribunal fixed the ALP interest rate at 5% and directed the Assessing Officer to compute the additional income at this rate on the outstanding amount.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's contentions regarding the jurisdiction of the TPO and the merit of the case but modified the quantum of additional income by adjusting the interest rate to 5%. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was allowed, with the Tribunal providing a balanced resolution to the issues raised.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found