Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs consideration of operating profit & internal TNMM for ITeS transactions, with 6% interest rate.</h1> <h3>Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3 (2), Hyderabad</h3> The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the AO/TPO to consider operating profit/operating cost of transactions and internal TNMM for ... TP Adjustment - MAM - determination of the most appropriate method to benchmark the international transaction in respect of IT enabled Services (ITeS) - Assessee contending that when the assessee is rendering ITeS services to both AE segment and non-AEs segment, the comparison of those segments affords very reliable results than adopting the PLI taken from the external comparables - HELD THAT:- Neither the assessee nor the Revenue contend that there is any change in the functions performed, assets employed, and the risks assumed by the assessee from the same as in the assessment year 2009-10 [2017 (12) TMI 1867 - ITAT HYDERABAD] - Since the facts of this year are identical to the facts involved in the year 2009-10, while respectfully following the view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench for the assessment year 2009-10, where it this issue to the file of the AO/learned TPO with a direction to consider only the operating profit/operating cost of the transactions and also to consider internal TNMM where the services rendered by the assessee are similar to both AEs and non-AEs. Grounds relating to the issue are answered accordingly. TP adjustment in respect of the interest on trade receivables - In view of the fact that this issue in [2022 (6) TMI 1386 - ITAT HYDERABAD] is no longer res integra and in assessee’s own case, a view is taken that the interest on trade receivables is an international transaction, and has to be benchmarked separately and after considering the relevant factors pleaded by the assessee for such assessment year, took the view that 6% per annum is the appropriate rate of interest, we do not find any reason to deviate from this view or to distribute such view. Since no change of circumstances is brought to our notice, we follow the said view and direct the learned AO/learned TPO to consider interest rate on outstanding receivable at the year end @6% and recompute the transfer pricing adjustment. Issues involved:The judgment involves two main issues: (1) determination of the most appropriate method to benchmark international transaction in respect of IT enabled Services (ITeS), and (2) Transfer Pricing adjustment in respect of the interest on trade receivables.Issue 1: Benchmarking of International Transaction in ITeS:The assessee, engaged in providing computer-aided design and engineering solutions, reported international transactions in ITeS. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) found trade receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs) and non-AEs. The TPO rejected the internal Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) and made Transfer Pricing adjustment using Profit Level Indicator (PLI) from external comparables. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the TPO's approach. The assessee contended that comparing segments of AE and non-AEs provides reliable results. Referring to a previous case, the Tribunal directed to consider only operating profit/operating cost of transactions and internal TNMM where services are similar to both AEs and non-AEs. The Tribunal remitted the issue to the AO/TPO to consider only the operating profit/operating cost of transactions and internal TNMM.Issue 2: Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Interest on Trade Receivables:The TPO computed interest on delayed trade receivables and made an adjustment. The DRP directed to adopt SBI short term deposit rates for interest calculation, following a precedent set by Bangalore-ITAT in a previous case. The assessee argued against the adjustment, stating it is a debt-free entity not charging interest to non-AEs. Referring to a previous case, the Tribunal applied a 6% interest rate on outstanding receivables at year-end. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to consider 6% interest rate on outstanding receivables and recompute the transfer pricing adjustment.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to consider operating profit/operating cost of transactions and internal TNMM for benchmarking ITeS transactions, and to apply a 6% interest rate on outstanding receivables for transfer pricing adjustment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found