Tribunal excludes telecom charges from turnover for deduction, remits receivables adjustment, and directs interest adjustment.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of telecommunication charges from both export and total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 10AA. The adjustment under Section 92(3) on outstanding receivables was remitted back to the TPO for re-evaluation based on industry standards. The levy of interest under Section 234B was directed to be adjusted consequentially. The decision emphasized adherence to industry standards and previous judicial precedents in deductions and adjustments.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Re-computation of deduction under Section 10AA of the Income-tax Act.
2. Adjustment under Section 92(3) on outstanding receivables.
3. Levying of interest under Section 234B of the Income-tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Re-computation of Deduction under Section 10AA of the Income-tax Act:

The assessee contested the re-computation of the deduction under Section 10AA of the Act. The Ld. TPO, AO, and DRP reduced telecommunication charges from the export turnover but did not exclude these from the total turnover, which affected the deduction computation. The assessee argued that this issue was already settled in its favor by the Tribunal in earlier years, referencing ITA No. 475/Hyd/2017 and others. The Tribunal agreed, citing the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd. and the jurisdictional High Court in B.A. Continuum, which mandated that if an expenditure is excluded from export turnover, it should also be excluded from total turnover. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to exclude telecommunication charges from both export and total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 10AA, thereby allowing this ground of appeal.

2. Adjustment under Section 92(3) on Outstanding Receivables:

The assessee challenged the adjustment of Rs. 17,71,128/- towards interest on outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs). The TPO had proposed interest charges on receivables beyond the due date, treating them as a separate international transaction under the amended Section 92B. The DRP directed the AO to compute interest as per domestic term deposit rates of SBI for FY 2012-13, resulting in a lower adjustment. The assessee argued against this adjustment, citing no interest was charged on delayed payments from both AEs and non-AEs, and that the outstanding receivables were part of normal business transactions. The Tribunal noted that the amendment to Section 92B brought such receivables under the purview of international transactions. The Tribunal directed the TPO to determine the industry average collection period and compare it with the assessee's average collection period, allowing interest charges only on periods exceeding the industry average, using the LIBOR rate for international transactions. This issue was remitted back to the TPO for re-evaluation, thus allowing the ground for statistical purposes.

3. Levying of Interest under Section 234B of the Income-tax Act:

This ground was consequential in nature. The Tribunal directed the AO to levy interest under Section 234B as per the final assessment, considering the directions given on other grounds.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing re-evaluation of the average collection period for outstanding receivables and ensuring telecommunication charges are excluded from both export and total turnover for Section 10AA deduction computation. The levy of interest under Section 234B was to be consequentially adjusted. The decision emphasized adherence to industry standards and previous judicial precedents in the computation of deductions and adjustments.

---