Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed goods were classifiable as dolomite slabs and tiles under heading 2505 or as marble slabs and tiles under heading 2504, and whether the matter required reconsideration in light of the CBEC circular.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on the nature of the goods and the evidentiary value of the test report. A CBEC circular dated 17.07.2002 had clarified that classification of marble slabs and tiles should be finalised on the basis of the report of GSI, Nagpur, and that where there were conflicting reports between CRCL and GSI, Nagpur, the GSI report would prevail. In the present matter, the samples had not been sent to GSI, Nagpur, so the existing adjudication could not be sustained without reconsideration.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh in accordance with the CBEC circular after granting hearing to the appellant.