Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court rules imported stones not marble. Technical interpretation required for tariff entry. Confiscation overturned.</h1> <h3>AKBAR BADRUDDIN JIWANI Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS</h3> AKBAR BADRUDDIN JIWANI Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - 1990 (47) E.L.T. 161 (SC), 1990 (2) SCC 203, 1990 AIR 1579, 1990 (1) SCR 369, 1990 (1) JT 256, 1990 ... Issues Involved:1. Classification of imported calcareous stones as marble under Tariff Item No. 25.15.2. Interpretation of the term 'marble' in the context of trade and commercial parlance versus scientific and technical definitions.3. Applicability of penalties and confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962, for alleged illegal import without a specific import license.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Imported Calcareous Stones as Marble:The core issue is whether the imported calcareous stones fall under the category of 'marble' as defined in Tariff Item No. 25.15. The appellant argued that the stones imported were not marble but other calcareous stones, which are allowed under the Open General Licence (OGL). They provided multiple certifications and geological reports to support their claim, including tests from the Geological Survey of India and certifications from foreign exporters, which stated that the stones were not marble but limestone. The Customs Department, however, classified the stones as marble based on visual observations and commercial definitions, leading to the confiscation of the goods and imposition of penalties.2. Interpretation of the Term 'Marble':The appellant contended that the term 'marble' in Tariff Item No. 25.15 should be interpreted in its technical and scientific sense rather than in commercial parlance. They cited various geological reports and standards, including the Indian Standard Specification for Marble (IS:1130-1969), which defines marble as a metamorphic rock formed from the recrystallization of limestones. The Customs Department, on the other hand, argued that the term should be understood in its commercial sense, where any hard calcareous stone capable of taking a polish could be considered marble. The court noted that the general principle of interpreting tariff entries in tax statutes is based on commercial nomenclature, but this principle can be departed from where the statutory context requires a technical interpretation.3. Applicability of Penalties and Confiscation:The Customs Department confiscated the goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and imposed a penalty under Section 112, alleging that the import was illegal without a specific import license. The appellant argued that they acted in good faith, believing that the stones were not marble and thus importable under OGL. The court found that the appellant took considerable precautions to ensure compliance with the law, including obtaining certifications and test reports. The court also noted that the burden of proof lay on the Customs Department to show that the appellant acted dishonestly or with the intent to breach the law. Given the appellant's bona fide belief and the lack of clear evidence from the Customs Department, the court concluded that the penalties and confiscation were not justified.Conclusion:The court held that the imported calcareous stones could not be classified as marble in the scientific and technical sense. It emphasized that the term 'marble' in the ITC Schedule should be interpreted technically, considering the specific gravity requirement and the geological definitions. The court set aside the order of confiscation and penalties, directing the release of the goods to the appellant and the release of the personal bond and bank guarantee. The court also waived any detention charges and demurrage for retaining the goods, recognizing the appellant's bona fide belief and efforts to comply with the import regulations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found