https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109943 Classification of the disputed goods depended on whether they were dolomite slabs and tiles under heading 2505 or marble slabs and tiles under heading 2504, and on the evidentiary basis for the test report. A CBEC circular dated 17.07.2002 required classification of marble slabs and tiles to be finalised on the report of GSI, Nagpur, and provided that GSI's report would prevail over conflicting CRCL findings. Because the samples had not been sent to GSI, Nagpur, the existing adjudication could not stand and the matter required reconsideration. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the appellant. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109943 Classification of the disputed goods depended on whether they were dolomite slabs and tiles under heading 2505 or marble slabs and tiles under heading 2504, and on the evidentiary basis for the test report. A CBEC circular dated 17.07.2002 required classification of marble slabs and tiles to be finalised on the report of GSI, Nagpur, and provided that GSI's report would prevail over conflicting CRCL findings. Because the samples had not been sent to GSI, Nagpur, the existing adjudication could not stand and the matter required reconsideration. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109943