Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent-company was unable to pay its debts so as to justify an for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The respondent-company did not seriously dispute the debt and admitted its financial inability to make payment. It also failed to comply with the court's earlier direction to deposit the admitted dues within the time granted. The factory had remained closed for a long time, no rehabilitation scheme was placed before the court, and the admitted financial crunch showed that the company was not in a position to discharge its liabilities. In these circumstances, continuing the company would serve no useful purpose.
Conclusion: The requirement of inability to pay debts was satisfied and the winding-up petition was allowed.