Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (8) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act') Chaudhary Attar Singh (the petitioner) has prayed for winding up of the company Subash Oil Mills (P.) Ltd. having its registered office at National Highway, Chhata, Mathura (the respondent-company) on the ground that the said respondent is indebted to the petitioner and has not been able to pay its debts despite the service of the statutory notice. 2. On notice being issued to the respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a case for admitting this petition and for advertising the same under rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 was made out. However, as the publication of the advertisement would have serious consequences on the business of the respondent, the Court directed that the publication of the advertisement shall remain stayed provided the respondent deposits the entire sum claimed by the petitioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fidavit, had not disputed its liability to pay the amount claimed by the petitioner. It has also candidly admitted that it was not in a position to pay its debts on account of the financial crunch. Despite, the Court having granted time to the respondent-company to pay the admit- ted dues in two installments it has failed to pay. Under the circumstances, it is evident that the company is unable to....