Compensation for share-transfer deficiency was not enhanced where no material proved the higher loss claimed.

A claim for enhanced compensation in a share-transfer deficiency dispute was rejected because the appellant failed to produce material supporting a higher award. The alleged two-month transfer period was not shown to be a prescribed standard, and the facts did not establish the loss claimed. On the available record, the compensation granted by the District Forum was found reasonable and the award of Rs. 1,000 was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to enhancement of compensation from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 70,000 for alleged deficiency in service in the transfer of shares.

Analysis: The appellant did not place material on record to justify the claim for enhanced compensation. The alleged two-month period for transfer of shares was not shown to be prescribed, and the circumstances did not support the claimed loss. The compensation awarded by the District Forum was found to be reasonable on the facts.

Conclusion: The claim for enhancement of compensation was rejected, and the award of Rs. 1,000 was upheld.

---