https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102580 A claim for enhanced compensation in a share-transfer deficiency dispute was rejected because the appellant failed to produce material supporting a higher award. The alleged two-month transfer period was not shown to be a prescribed standard, and the facts did not establish the loss claimed. On the available record, the compensation granted by the District Forum was found reasonable and the award of Rs. 1,000 was upheld. en-us Wed, 04 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102580 A claim for enhanced compensation in a share-transfer deficiency dispute was rejected because the appellant failed to produce material supporting a higher award. The alleged two-month transfer period was not shown to be a prescribed standard, and the facts did not establish the loss claimed. On the available record, the compensation granted by the District Forum was found reasonable and the award of Rs. 1,000 was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102580