Disqualification of authorised income-tax practitioner for misconduct requires recorded findings, reasons for disagreement, and disclosure of inquiry report. The prescribed authority must examine the Inquiry Officer's report, record findings on each charge, and state reasons for any disagreement. If satisfied that an authorised income-tax practitioner has committed misconduct in income-tax proceedings, it may direct disqualification from representing an assessee under section 515(1) for the period determined and remove the practitioner's name from the register for that period. The authority must also furnish the practitioner with the report, its findings, and reasons for disagreement when communicating the disqualification order.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Disqualification of authorised income-tax practitioner for misconduct requires recorded findings, reasons for disagreement, and disclosure of inquiry report.
The prescribed authority must examine the Inquiry Officer's report, record findings on each charge, and state reasons for any disagreement. If satisfied that an authorised income-tax practitioner has committed misconduct in income-tax proceedings, it may direct disqualification from representing an assessee under section 515(1) for the period determined and remove the practitioner's name from the register for that period. The authority must also furnish the practitioner with the report, its findings, and reasons for disagreement when communicating the disqualification order.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.