Confidentiality protections for submitted evidence limit public disclosure of trade secrets and require marked public and confidential versions. Regulation 35 creates a confidentiality regime permitting parties to seek confidential treatment where disclosure would reveal trade secrets, diminish ... Summary
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Confidentiality protections for submitted evidence limit public disclosure of trade secrets and require marked public and confidential versions.
Regulation 35 creates a confidentiality regime permitting parties to seek confidential treatment where disclosure would reveal trade secrets, diminish commercial value, or cause serious injury; requests must state cogent reasons and, where possible, an expiry date. Claimants must file both a marked confidential version and a corresponding public version with omissions conspicuously indicated; only the public version is served on other parties. The Commission or Director General may grant confidentiality for a specified period, require segregation of confidential records, mandate dual versions of orders containing confidential material, and impose non-disclosure obligations on persons privy to such materials, with disciplinary or contractual consequences for breaches.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.