Competition assessment process requires institutional or in house review, Advocacy scrutiny, and Commission recommendation for legislative or policy modification. The guidelines require assignment of identified legislation or policy to an empanelled institution or an in house team, with the Commission deciding assignment and honorarium. The assignee must produce an assessment in the prescribed format containing findings, observations and suggested modifications with rationale. The Advocacy Division reviews and forwards the assessment and its views to the Commission, which then forms its views and may recommend competition based modifications to legislatures, administrative departments, or statutory authorities, and may publish the assessment.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Competition assessment process requires institutional or in house review, Advocacy scrutiny, and Commission recommendation for legislative or policy modification.
The guidelines require assignment of identified legislation or policy to an empanelled institution or an in house team, with the Commission deciding assignment and honorarium. The assignee must produce an assessment in the prescribed format containing findings, observations and suggested modifications with rationale. The Advocacy Division reviews and forwards the assessment and its views to the Commission, which then forms its views and may recommend competition based modifications to legislatures, administrative departments, or statutory authorities, and may publish the assessment.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.