Settlement order does not constitute admissible evidence in unrelated proceedings and does not extinguish third-party rights. A settlement order under the Regulations is not admissible as evidence in proceedings about alleged defaults not covered by the order and does not affect third-party rights arising from the alleged default. Where an applicant who obtained a settlement order is a noticee with others, observations may be made about the applicant only as necessary to prove another's act, and such observations are subject to the settlement order unless revoked; observations in a settlement order are not admissible per se against other persons.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Settlement order does not constitute admissible evidence in unrelated proceedings and does not extinguish third-party rights.
A settlement order under the Regulations is not admissible as evidence in proceedings about alleged defaults not covered by the order and does not affect third-party rights arising from the alleged default. Where an applicant who obtained a settlement order is a noticee with others, observations may be made about the applicant only as necessary to prove another's act, and such observations are subject to the settlement order unless revoked; observations in a settlement order are not admissible per se against other persons.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.