Para 19 - Review in exceptional situations of grave injustice in case of final reward due to not following provisions of Reward Scheme or factual incorrectness
Review petition for reward scheme non-compliance allows informants to seek reconsideration of final reward decisions. An informant alleging grave injustice from non-adherence to the Reward Scheme or factual incorrectness may file a review petition before the DGIT(Inv), specifying which scheme provisions were not followed or what factual errors occurred; the DGIT(Inv) must place such petitions before a review committee (Principal CCIT (CCA) of the region, a nominated CCIT or Principal CIT, and the DGIT(Inv)) with JCIT/Addl. CIT (BP) as Secretary, which will examine the grievance, take necessary action and communicate its decision.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Review petition for reward scheme non-compliance allows informants to seek reconsideration of final reward decisions.
An informant alleging grave injustice from non-adherence to the Reward Scheme or factual incorrectness may file a review petition before the DGIT(Inv), specifying which scheme provisions were not followed or what factual errors occurred; the DGIT(Inv) must place such petitions before a review committee (Principal CCIT (CCA) of the region, a nominated CCIT or Principal CIT, and the DGIT(Inv)) with JCIT/Addl. CIT (BP) as Secretary, which will examine the grievance, take necessary action and communicate its decision.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
