Safeguard investigations require injury findings, causal linkage, reasoned recommendations, and structured tariff rate quota administration Rule 11 requires the Director General to determine whether increased imports caused or threatened serious injury to the domestic industry and whether a causal link exists. The Director General must recommend the extent and duration of any safeguard measure, including tariff rate quota conditions, allocation, residual availability, and carry-forward of unused quota. Affirmative final findings must state the facts, law, and reasons, be published through a public notice, and be sent to the Ministries of Commerce and Finance. Measures exceeding one year require recommendations for progressive liberalisation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Rule 11 requires the Director General to determine whether increased imports caused or threatened serious injury to the domestic industry and whether a causal link exists. The Director General must recommend the extent and duration of any safeguard measure, including tariff rate quota conditions, allocation, residual availability, and carry-forward of unused quota. Affirmative final findings must state the facts, law, and reasons, be published through a public notice, and be sent to the Ministries of Commerce and Finance. Measures exceeding one year require recommendations for progressive liberalisation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.