Safeguard investigation: imports must be shown to cause serious injury through objective, quantifiable evidence establishing a causal link. Safeguard investigations require the Director General to evaluate objective and quantifiable factors-including import increase rate and amount, market share taken by imports, and changes in sales, production, productivity, capacity utilization, profits and employment-to determine whether increased imports have caused or threaten to cause serious injury. A determination must be grounded in objective evidence demonstrating a causal link between import increases and the injury; injury caused by other factors must not be attributed to imports, and such cases may be referred for anti dumping or countervailing duty investigation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Safeguard investigation: imports must be shown to cause serious injury through objective, quantifiable evidence establishing a causal link.
Safeguard investigations require the Director General to evaluate objective and quantifiable factors-including import increase rate and amount, market share taken by imports, and changes in sales, production, productivity, capacity utilization, profits and employment-to determine whether increased imports have caused or threaten to cause serious injury. A determination must be grounded in objective evidence demonstrating a causal link between import increases and the injury; injury caused by other factors must not be attributed to imports, and such cases may be referred for anti dumping or countervailing duty investigation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.