Rule 8 - Determination of serious injury or threat of serious injury. The Director General shall determine serious injury or threat of serious injury to the domestic industry taking into account the following principles
Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Measures) Rules, 1997
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Determination of serious injury: imports require objective, quantifiable evidence and a demonstrated causal link before safeguards apply. Determination of serious injury requires the Director General to evaluate objective and quantifiable factors-including the rate and amount of import increases, market share taken by imports, and changes in sales, production, productivity, capacity utilisation, profits and losses, and employment-and to establish, on the basis of objective evidence, a causal link between increased imports and the injury; if other factors concurrently cause injury, that injury shall not be attributed to increased imports and the matter may be referred for antidumping or countervailing investigation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Determination of serious injury: imports require objective, quantifiable evidence and a demonstrated causal link before safeguards apply.
Determination of serious injury requires the Director General to evaluate objective and quantifiable factors-including the rate and amount of import increases, market share taken by imports, and changes in sales, production, productivity, capacity utilisation, profits and losses, and employment-and to establish, on the basis of objective evidence, a causal link between increased imports and the injury; if other factors concurrently cause injury, that injury shall not be attributed to increased imports and the matter may be referred for antidumping or countervailing investigation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.