Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Landmark Judgment on Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS ...
    A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.
    Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (E...
    The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of reopening of assessment - need for a direct link between the portal's information and th...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional release of imported goods (apples) - The dispute centers on the valuation of the import...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Applicability of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of expenses - need for tax authorities to have a practical understanding of the nature ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of the assessee's business expenditure claims related to the purchase of sugarcane from...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Additions made u/s 69 and Section 56 in the absence of direct incriminating evidence linking the ass...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the ent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Liability for payment of customs duty on sale of excess liquor from the duty-free shop
    Case LawsCustoms
    Demand of customs duty beyond normal period of limitation on the ground of change in classification ...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Stringent approach towards ensuring compliance with auditing standards - importance of auditors' res...
    Whether the appellant's claim can be classified as a Financial Debt or Operational Debt under the In...
    Scope of Approval of resolution plan - Allegations of undervaluation of the Corporate Debtor's asset...
    Denial of Input Tax Credit since the GST registration of the Supplier of Goods has been Cancelled wi...
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a vested right or concession - Can government impose conditions or restric...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    TDS credit entitlement affirmed: deductee entitled to credit despite deductor's non-deposit, preventing indirect recovery.
    Credit for tax deducted at source on interest payments is to be treated as tax paid on the deductee's behalf and does not depend on the deductor's remittance; statutory protections against indirect recovery prevent the revenue from seeking the same tax from the deductee when the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, and the deposit requirement in the applicable provisions does not negate the deductee's entitlement to such credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for TDS: deductee entitled to credit even if deductor failed to deposit the retained tax with government.
    The Court treats amounts retained by a deductor as remaining tax and concludes the statutory credit mechanism for tax deducted at source does not condition a deductee's entitlement on the deductor having deposited the retained amount with the government, thereby barring indirect recovery or adjustment against the deductee where tax has been deducted at source.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Coercive tax collection prohibited; forced reversal of input tax credit during search deemed impermissible, with investigatory remedies preserved.
    Dispute involved a search under Section 67 and an alleged coerced reversal of Input Tax Credit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger for supplies from a supplier with retrospectively cancelled registration; the court found such coercive recovery during search impermissible and directed restoration of the ITC while preserving the department's power to investigate and, if ineligible or fraudulent ITC is found, pass appropriate protective orders.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit payment method: Electronic credit ledger debit does not satisfy pre-deposit; cash ledger payment required for appeals.
    Pre-deposit for appeals under the CGST/BGST regime must be paid from the cash ledger; debit from the electronic credit ledger does not satisfy the statutory pre-deposit requirement. A revenue circular restricting ECRL use to certain output tax payments and excluding reverse charge, interest, penalties, fees, and similar amounts supports that ECRL cannot be used for pre-deposit. The court emphasized the statutory payment scheme and strict appeal filing timelines, rejecting arguments that ECRL debit could substitute for cash ledger payment.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Requirement of clear reasons in GST cancellation: retrospective deregistration must be reasoned and consider input tax credit effects.
    Cancellation of GST registration must be supported by clear reasons and concrete factual findings in show cause notices and cancellation orders; labels that a registration is "liable to be cancelled" without specifying dues or factual basis constitute mechanical action. Retrospective cancellation cannot be applied routinely; authorities must follow statutory procedure, assess causes for non-filing, consider exceptional disruptions to business operations, and account for the impact on input tax credit before fixing an effective date of cancellation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use of portal data: digital information needs a direct evidential link before reopening income tax assessments.
    Reopening assessments requires a direct evidential link between portal-derived information and the income alleged to have escaped assessment; portal data alone is insufficient without documentary support for transactions or gifts, and a show cause notice must provide adequate particulars and reflect proper consideration of the taxpayer's response before reassessment proceeds.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Non retrospective application of punitive benami provisions affirmed, limiting enforcement to post amendment transactions.
    Application of Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 concerns whether punitive provisions enacted in 2016 apply to transactions predating the amendment. The Appellate Tribunal relied on Supreme Court precedent that such punitive provisions must be applied prospectively, and the High Court emphasized adherence to that interpretation while allowing parties to pursue further remedies pending the Supreme Court review.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of perishable imports allowed pending valuation, subject to provisional assessment and bond to protect revenue interests.
    The dispute concerns provisional release of perishable imported apples amid a valuation contest tied to a stayed minimum import price notification. The instrument requires provisional assessment of the Bill of Entry within a brief timeframe and permits conditional provisional release upon the importer furnishing a bond and meeting terms set by customs, thereby reconciling the protection of revenue interests with the practical need to avoid loss to perishable consignments pending final resolution of the notification's applicability.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Prospective application of punitive benami amendment upheld, limiting reach to post-enactment transactions and preserving pre-enactment protections.
    The Madras High Court affirmed that the enhanced punitive provision introduced by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is substantive and applies prospectively; it endorsed the Tribunal's reliance on the Supreme Court's Ganapati Dealcom decision, treated a pending Supreme Court review petition as not displacing that precedent, and disposed of the appeals while allowing further proceedings consistent with prospectivity and prior constitutional findings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenses must rest on specific documentation defects, not on blanket percentage adjustments.
    Disallowance of business expenses on a summary or estimate basis requires specific, pointed deficiencies and cannot rest on generalized conclusions about excessiveness; in businesses with routine small transactions, tax authorities must examine the nature of operations and identify particular defects in documentation before applying blanket percentage disallowances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory Minimum Price interpretation: excess cane payments treated as appropriation of profits, not deductible business expense.
    The core issue is whether payments for sugarcane in excess of the Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) are deductible business expenditures or constitute an appropriation of profits. The Assessing Officer relied on standard accounting practice requiring provisions for liabilities at year end and treated post closing excess payments as distributions of operational surplus. The appellate view upheld that cooperative status does not alter the tax analysis and that payments beyond the SMP do not qualify as allowable business expenses absent proper provisioning within the accounting period.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Direct incriminating evidence requirement: third party search materials alone cannot sustain unexplained investment additions.
    Additions alleged as unexplained investments and undisclosed interest income based on third party search materials require a demonstrable direct nexus between those seized records and the assessee; absent such direct incriminating evidence, reliance on third party statements or documents is insufficient. Procedural safeguards and transactional indicia-such as cross examination opportunities, banking records, documentary support, and TDS-reduce the probative value of seized material when direct linkage is lacking.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under Section 114A: no justification where importer accepted correct classification and paid differential duty before notice.
    Issue: imposition of a penalty for alleged suppression when the importer accepted correct tariff classification and paid the differential duty with interest before issuance of a show cause notice. The importer attributed the earlier misclassification to an agent error and denied intent to evade duty. The authority observed the accurate product description, admission of correct classification and prompt payment, concluded absence of suppression of facts and determined that the statutory penalty provision was not justified on these facts.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Liability under Section 72: duty rests with duty-free shop licence-holder when trade facility conditions are breached.
    Duty arises where a duty-free shop licence-holder breaches voucher and recordkeeping conditions under the trade facility; the licence-holder bears responsibility for payment of duty and interest when procedural requirements are violated, while penalty depends on culpability and may be disallowed where no intent to evade duty is established and customs were aware of the transactions.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation in customs demands inapplicable where no suppression, limiting reassessment for CVD on undeclared MRP entries.
    Reassessment and CVD demand arose from a post-clearance change in classification and retrospective reliance on MRP for past entries; the tribunal held that items described were essential refrigeration parts rather than accessories, that MRP-based reassessment requires clear factual basis, and that the Extended Period of Limitation is inapplicable where no suppression is established, although penalty issues may still be considered where omissions occur.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Auditor responsibility reinforced: regulatory findings against audit failures stress strict adherence to auditing standards and sanctions.
    NFRA found a statutory auditor guilty of professional misconduct for failures to comply with Standards on Auditing, including inadequate procedures to verify revenue, lack of physical inventory verification, insufficient going concern assessment, deficient materiality application, and inadequate communication with Those Charged with Governance, and applied regulatory sanctions to reinforce auditor responsibilities in preserving financial reporting integrity.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Operational debt classification confirmed for supplier's claim based on the transaction's nature under the insolvency framework.
    Whether a claim from a supply arrangement is a Financial Debt or an Operational Debt depends on the transaction's substantive character. The tribunal examined contractual terms-penalties for non-delivery, interest, and security cheques-and applied precedents on the financial-versus-operational distinction. It characterised the supplier's claim, filed under Section 9, as arising from the supply of goods and therefore as an operational debt, sustaining the Resolution Professional's and Adjudicating Authority's classification.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial wisdom of committee of creditors governs resolution plan approval, limiting valuation and standing challenges by promoters.
    Exclusion of the creditor was non irregular as no claim was filed; undervaluation allegations were rejected since opportunities to raise them during the CIRP were not used; the resolution plan satisfied Committee approval requirements and reflected the Committee's commercial wisdom; and a suspended director/promoter lacked standing to challenge the approved plan, underscoring limited judicial interference post approval.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit denial over supplier deregistration; remanded for document verification and fresh adjudication to determine genuineness.
    Denial of Input Tax Credit was challenged where the supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; the petitioner paid through bank and the supplier appeared on records at the time. The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner's documentary evidence, hold a hearing, and pass a reasoned order verifying genuineness and timing of transactions; if purchases are genuine and occurred prior to cancellation, ITC is to be considered per precedent.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit as legislative concession: entitlement subject to statutory conditions, but retrospective deprivation of vested accruals is vulnerable.
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a legislative concession, not a vested right, so the legislature may lawfully prescribe eligibility conditions and procedural limits which taxpayers must strictly satisfy; however, retrospective amendments that destroy or diminish an already accrued entitlement are susceptible to challenge and have been treated as impermissible when they impair rights that vested before the amendment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Money Laundering

      Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

      9 May, 2023

      Contents
      Notifications
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

       Section 2 - Definitions.

      Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity

      Preamble 

      Introduction & Overview of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      Origin & Object of PMLA

      Objective is to curb acts of moneylaudering & to punish the offender

      PMLA, 2002 came into force w.e.f 1st July 2005 and has undergone several amendments till now.

       • It extends to whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir

      • Preamble is to prevent money-laundering and provide for confiscation of property derived from, Or involved in money-laundering and to punish those who commit the offence.

       

      Defination of Money Laundering

       Means any act of acquiring untainted property or disguising financial assets

      • According to Section 3 Read with rule 2 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      – “whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money

      Laundering.

      • Money laundering involves disguising financial assets so that they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them.

       

      Process of Money Laundering: Placement, Layering & Integration

      1. Placement (depositing into banks)

      Dirty money being inserted in financial system. The first stage is the physical disposal of cash. The launderer introduces his illegal profits into the financial system. This placement is accomplished by depositing the cash in domestic banks or in other types of formal or informal financial institutions.

      1. Layering (making shell companies causing rotation of money)

      Separates the proceeds from their criminal origin by moving them through a series of financial transactions. The Second stage in money laundering is layering. The launderer engages in a series of conversions or movements of the funds to distance them from their source. Shell companies (i.e. paper companies/bogus companies) serve as front and are registered in offshore havens. They are a common tool in the layering phase.

      1. Integration(acquiring legitimate explanation through investments, loans etc)

      Creating a legitimate explanation for their sources of funds, allowing them to be retained, invested or used, to acquire goods or assets. This is the stage where the funds are returned to the legitimate economy for later extraction. Examples include investing in a company, purchasing real estate, luxury goods, etc. This is the final stage in the process.



       

      Reporting Entity

      To strength the control and achieve the desired goal, the concept of reporting entity is introduced w.e.f. w.e.f. 15-2-2013 to the PMLA, 2002

      Accordingly, clause (wa) to section 2(1) read as:-

      (wa) "reporting entity" means a banking company, financial institution, intermediary or a person carrying on a designated business or profession;

      Thus, as per clause (wa) the following persons are made reporting entity under PMLA

        • a banking company (see clause (e))
        • a financial institution (see clause (i))
        • an intermediary (see clause (n))
        •  a person carrying on a designated business or profession (see clause (sa) hereinbelow:)

      Simultaneously, clause (sa) inserted to section 2(1) to define the scope and meaning of “person carrying on designated business or profession" introduced as:

      (sa) "person carrying on designated business or profession" means,-

      (i) a person carrying on activities for playing games of chance for cash or kind, and includes such activities associated with casino;

      (ii) Inspector-General of Registration appointed under section 3 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908.) as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iii) real estate agent, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iv) dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (v) person engaged in safekeeping and administration of cash and liquid securities on behalf of other persons, as may be notified by the Central Government; or

      (vi) person carrying on such other activities as the Central Government may, by notification, so designate, from time to time;


      Notified Persons / Reporting entities u/s 2(1)(sa)

      With the passage to time, Ministry of Finance of the Central Government is notifying more and more category of persons as reporting entity as:

      1.       As per notification dated 24-9-2014 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Looping of reporting entity

        • any person carrying on the business, either on its own behalf or on behalf of other reporting entities,
        • of storing, safeguarding and retrieving the records of the documents mentioned in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 12 of the said Act and the rules made thereunder
        • shall be deemed to be a person carrying on designated business or profession

      2.       Notification No. 2/2015 dated 15-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • any person, licensed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
        • to perform the functions as specified in regulation 3 or regulation 4 or regulation 5 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2002,
        • shall be deemed to be a "person carrying on designated business or profession"

      3.       Notification no. 3/2015 dated 17-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(ii))

        • a Registrar or Sub-Registrar appointed under section 6 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908)
        • as a "person carrying on designated business or profession".

      4.         Notification no. 4/2017 dated 23-8-2017(Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 23-8-2017 to 5-10-2017

        • dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods
        • having a turnover of rupees two crore in a financial year
        • as a person carrying on designated business or profession.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 6-10-2017

      5.       Notification No. 8/2017 dated 15-11-2017 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 15-11-2017 to 27-12-2020

        • ‘real estate agents’ as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (No. 16 of 2016)
        • shall be deemed to be a “person carrying on designated business or profession”

       Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 28-12-2020 

      6.         Notification No. 3/2018 dated 4-5-2018 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        •  the Multi-State Co-operative Society registered under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002)
        • designated as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      7.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

        • the dealers in precious metals, precious stones as persons carrying on designated businesses or professions
        • if they engage in any cash transactions with a customer equal to or above Rupees ten lakhs, carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.

      8.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 28-12-2020 to 28-11-2022

        •  the “Real Estate Agents”, as a person
        • engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs or above,
        • as “persons carrying on designated businesses or professions”.

      This notification has been rescinded vide Notification dated 29-11-2022

      9.         Notification dated 29-11-2022 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 29-11-2022

        •  ‘real estate agents’
        • as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016) and as a person engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs and above,
        • as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      10.         Notification dated 7-3-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • activities when carried out for or on behalf of another natural or legal person in the course of business as an activity for the purposes of said sub sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) exchange between virtual digital assets and fiat currencies;

      (ii) exchange between one or more forms of virtual digital assets;

      (iii) transfer of virtual digital assets;

      (iv) safekeeping or administration of virtual digital assets or instruments enabling control over virtual digital assets; and

      (v) participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer’s offer and sale of a virtual digital asset.

      Explanation:- For the purposes of this notification “virtual digital asset” shall have the same meaning assigned to it in clause (47A) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      11.       Notification dated 3-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Practicing CA, CS, CWA included in the list as:

        •  the financial transactions carried out by a relevant person on behalf of his client, in the course of his or her profession, in relation to the following activities-

      (i) buying and selling of any immovable property;

      (ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;

      (iii) management of bank, savings or securities accounts;

      (iv) organisation of contributions for the creation, operation or management of companies;

      (v) creation, operation or management of companies, limited liability partnerships or trusts, and buying and selling of business entities,

      shall be an activity for the purposes of said sub-section.

      Explanation 1.- For the purposes of this notification ‘relevant person’ includes –

      (i) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (ii) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (iii) an individual who has obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted.

      Explanation 2.- For the purposes of this notification ‘firm’ shall have the same meaning assigned to it in sub-clause (i) of clause (23) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      12.       Notification dated 9-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Specified activities notified - Reporting entity

       Following activities when carried out in the course of business on behalf of or for another person, as the case may be, as an activity for the purposes of said sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) acting as a formation agent of companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (ii) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a director or secretary of a company, a partner of a firm or a similar position in relation to other companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (iii) providing a registered office, business address or accommodation, correspondence or administrative address for a company or a limited liability partnership or a trust;

      (iv) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a trustee of an express trust or performing the equivalent function for another type of trust; and

      (v) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a nominee shareholder for another person.

      Explanation.–For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the following activities shall not be regarded as activity for the purposes of sub-clause (vi) of clause (sa) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Act, namely:-

      (a) any activity that is carried out as part of any agreement of lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of land or building or any space and the consideration is subjected to deduction of income-tax as defined under section 194-I of Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961); or

      (b) any activity that is carried out by an employee on behalf of his employer in the course of or in relation to his employment; or

      (c) any activity that is carried out by an advocate, a chartered accountant, cost accountant or company secretary in practice, who is engaged in the formation of a company to the extent of filing a declaration as required under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 7 of Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013); or

      (d) any activity of a person which falls within the meaning of an intermediary as defined in clause (n) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003).

       

      Also see:

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity



      Note:

      The above list is prepared for general information purpose only by TMI, for more information please check the original notifications issued by the Government.

      More notification u/s 2(1)(sa) may follow the list. 

      Customized search

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax