Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

NCLAT upholds CMA's categorization of rental claims as "under adjudication.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NCLAT upheld CMA's categorization of claims related to delay in possession as "put under adjudication". CMA rightly asserted inability to verify rental claims unilaterally when agreement didn't provide for reimbursement of rent or commitment to pay rent. Claims premised on rental agreements fell under adjudication beyond CMA's limited jurisdiction. Unliquidated damages for delayed delivery and mental agony couldn't be admitted without agreement between parties. Appeal dismissed.....

PrevPreviousNextNext