Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Tax demand upheld, non-payment not beyond petitioner's control (2A.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Petitioner failed to establish non-payment of tax demanded was beyond their control. CC reasonably exercised powers u/s 220(2A) after considering relevant circumstances and material on record. Factual findings supported by evidence, no perversity. Chander Prakash Jain case distinguishable on facts, not involving Section 220(2A). HC does not exercise appellate jurisdiction. All three preconditions for waiver u/s 220(2A) not met. Petition dismissed.....

PrevPreviousNextNext