https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84932 NCLAT upheld CMA's categorization of claims related to delay in possession as "put under adjudication". CMA rightly asserted inability to verify rental claims unilaterally when agreement didn't provide for reimbursement of rent or commitment to pay rent. Claims premised on rental agreements fell under adjudication beyond CMA's limited jurisdiction. Unliquidated damages for delayed delivery and mental agony couldn't be admitted without agreement between parties. Appeal dismissed. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84932 NCLAT upheld CMA's categorization of claims related to delay in possession as "put under adjudication". CMA rightly asserted inability to verify rental claims unilaterally when agreement didn't provide for reimbursement of rent or commitment to pay rent. Claims premised on rental agreements fell under adjudication beyond CMA's limited jurisdiction. Unliquidated damages for delayed delivery and mental agony couldn't be admitted without agreement between parties. Appeal dismissed. Highlights Companies Law Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:45:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84932