Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (7) TMI 1333

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : Mr. K. K. Maiti, Mr. Tapan Bhanja. For the UOI : Mr. Debasish Chaudhuri, Ms. Sanjukta Gupta. ORDER 1. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned adjudication order dated 31st March, 2023, passed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata, South, on the ground that there is a procedural irregularity in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the exception under Section 73(1) of the Finance Tax Act, 1994 and further that the pre-show cause notice is not mandatory in cases which falls under those exceptions. 5. Mr. Mazumder, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that in the facts and circumstances of the case, case of the petitioner does not fall within those exceptions. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the cas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....th the adjudication order after participating in the impugned proceeding, now at this stage petitioner cannot turn around and challenge the impugned order of adjudication, on the ground that in spite of the show-cause notice being issued and he has responded to the same still the impugned adjudication order should be interfered since pre-show cause notice was not issued in this case. v) T....