https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311282 An appealable adjudication order ordinarily should not be challenged by writ when the statutory appellate remedy is available, and writ interference is especially unwarranted where the petitioner appears to bypass that remedy. The Court also declined to examine the factual basis for invocation of the extended period under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, and held that a belated objection to the absence of a pre-show cause notice was not open after the petitioners had contested the notice and participated in adjudication. On these grounds, writ relief was refused and the adjudication order was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Dec 2023 15:06:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311282 An appealable adjudication order ordinarily should not be challenged by writ when the statutory appellate remedy is available, and writ interference is especially unwarranted where the petitioner appears to bypass that remedy. The Court also declined to examine the factual basis for invocation of the extended period under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, and held that a belated objection to the absence of a pre-show cause notice was not open after the petitioners had contested the notice and participated in adjudication. On these grounds, writ relief was refused and the adjudication order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311282