Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (6) TMI 1713

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CIR, Sr. DR ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM These are appeals filed by the assessee company against the order of the CIT(A) - Jalpaiguri, dated 25.05.2017 for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2014-15. 1A. At the outset, we find that the appeal of the assessee is time barred by 20 days and a condonation petition has been filed. After hearing both the sides, we condone the delay and admit the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he AO noted that there was unexplained expenditure so, he made addition u/s 69C & on the basis of violation of section 40(a)(ia) and section 40A(3) for AY 2014-15 an amount of Rs. 54,57,223/- & Rs. 1,10,97,600/- was disallowed. Similarly for AY 2011-12 disallowance u/s 40A(3) Rs. 52,62,039/- was made. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted the additions made u/s 69C, 40(a)(ia) & 40A(3) of the Act and t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0A(3) of the Act as well as addition u/s 69C of the Act. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the additions made u/s 40(a)(ia), sec. 40A(3) & sec. 69C of the Act and thereafter has rejected the books of accounts of the assessee and estimated the net profit at 8%. The main plea of the assessee is that the net profit of 8% is very high and relied on certain decisions of the Tribunal wherein lesser ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant Adjustments as per Table-III above Read net profit declared in the accounts of the appellant Net Profit percentage A B C D(B+C)   2011-12 Rs. 1,32,15,854* Rs. 1,62,32,408 Rs. 2,94,48,262 5.48% 2012-13 Rs. 1,92,42,218** Rs. 1,98,14,384 Rs. 3,90,56,602 6.04% 2013-14 Rs. 1,69,87,042*** Rs. 1,55,97,226 Rs. 3,25,84,268 5.85% ....