Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (11) TMI 557

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aint No.04/2018 titled as Shri Sitaram Meena, Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Jaipur Vs. Rajkumar Daitapati for the offence punishable under Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (Sessions Case No.37/2021 (ECIR No.JPZO/1/2015) (Rajkumar Daitapati Vs. Enforcement Directorate)) and against the order dated 27.09.2021 passed by the court of learned Sessions Judge (the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002) Special Judge (CBI) No.3, Jaipur Metorpolitan-I in Misc. Case No.31/2021 whereby the learned trial court has dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner. So, the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgments passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (Criminal Appeal No.89/2021 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4657/2020) decided on 29.01.2021 and Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (Criminal Appeal No.838/2021 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5442/2021) decided on 16.08.2021. Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner is totally misconceived and not maintainable. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that the petitioner had not ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....19 decided on 24.01.2020; (10) Shyam Sundar Singhvi Vs. Union of India in SLP (Crl.) No.792/2020; (11) Manubha Nanubha Kathi Vs. Commissioner of Police in Special Civil Application No.9651/2009 decided on 14.05.2010; (12) Sanatan Pandey Vs. State of U.P. In SLP (Crl.) No.7358/2021; (13) Dr. Ashok Singhvi Vs. Union of India in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6273/2020 decided on 06.07.2020; (14) Court on its own motion Vs. State reported in 2018 SCC online Del. 12306; (15) Sh. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Vs. State of Punjab reported in (1980) 2 SCC 565; (16) Sushila Agarwal Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi reported in (2020) 5 SCC 1; (17) Sudhir Kumar Kad Vs. CBI in M.G.C. No.9763/2020 decided on 19.03.2020; (18) Sudhir Kumar Kad Vs. CBI in Sp....