<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 557 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414776</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a money laundering prosecution was examined against the seriousness of the alleged economic offence and the petitioner&#039;s failure to challenge the order rejecting the warrant-related request. The Court applied the settled approach that anticipatory bail is not granted as a matter of course in serious economic offences, particularly where the allegations are grave. On that basis, the petitioner was found not entitled to anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 557 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414776</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a money laundering prosecution was examined against the seriousness of the alleged economic offence and the petitioner&#039;s failure to challenge the order rejecting the warrant-related request. The Court applied the settled approach that anticipatory bail is not granted as a matter of course in serious economic offences, particularly where the allegations are grave. On that basis, the petitioner was found not entitled to anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>