TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Analysis: The application was considered in light of the seriousness of the alleged economic offence and the fact that the petitioner had not challenged the order rejecting the request concerning the warrant. The Court noted the gravity of the allegations and referred to the settled approach that anticipatory bail is not to be granted as a matter of course in serious economic offences.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to anticipatory bail.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
