We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
<h1>Supreme Court Orders Appellant to Deposit Rs. 1 Crore with Enforcement Directorate; Funds to Aid Complainants.</h1> The SC modified a previous order, requiring the appellant to deposit a total of Rs. 1,00,00,000 with the Directorate of Enforcement at Union Bank of ... Money Laundering - Seeking grant of Anticipatory Bail - commission of a serious economic offence of money laundering - offence punishable under Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - it was held by High Court that 'The anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner is dismissed.' HELD THAT:- In view of the averments made in the present application, the order dated 21.11.2024 is partly modified and it is clarified that the appellant, Rajkumar Daitapati, has deposited ₹80,00,000/- in the account of the respondent, Directorate of Enforcement, in the Union Bank of India (erstwhile, Corporation Bank). ₹20,00,000/- will also be deposited in the same account. Application disposed off. The Supreme Court, presided over by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, addressed a modification to an earlier order dated 21.11.2024. The appellant, Rajkumar Daitapati, has deposited Rs. 80,00,000 in the account of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) at the Union Bank of India. An additional Rs. 20,00,000 is to be deposited in the same account. The Court clarified that the deposited amount will be repatriated to the complainants, including Tom Izaks, after necessary formalities are completed. The ED is granted the opportunity to file an application with the Court if any grievances arise. The ED is also tasked with informing the complainants of this order. The miscellaneous application is resolved as per these terms.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
