2018 (5) TMI 990

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate- For Respondent JUDGMENT MR. SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, challenge is to impugned orders of 15th January, 2018 vide which petitioners' Representations have been rejected while observing that petitioner-Kulranjan Toppo is holding the post of DGM (IT) in the Grade Pay of Rs. 7600/- and petitioner-Sunil Dwivedi is holding the post of DGM (Finance) in the same ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n Toppo whereas in case of petitioner-Sunil Dwivedi, the approval was not granted. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that as per RTI information of 26th September, 2016 by Delhi Transco Limited, the Managers working in the Grade Pay of Rs. 7600/- have been provided Executive Car Facility. It is also pointed out by petitioners' counsel that as per sub-Rule 7 of Rule 6 of Delhi Electricity Re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t of Executive Car Facility was extended to petitioner-Kulranjan Toppo in the year 2012 and the differential amount deposited by petitioner-Kulranjan Toppo in September, 2016 was promptly refunded to him in October, 2016. Attention of this Court is drawn to respondent's Executive Car Policy (Annexure P-4 in W.P.(C) 4683/2018) to point out that the entitlement to Executive Car Facility under this P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Car Policy, the requirement of Grade Pay of Rs. 8900/- is not reflected. All that is required as per respondent's Executive Car Policy (Annexure-4) is that the concerned Officer has to be DGM (M3a). It is not the case of respondent that petitioners are not DGM (M3a). It is matter of record that petitioners had applied for the Executive Car Facility in question before the Office Order of 3rd Octo....