AI Drafter 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (5) TMI 989
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....04.2016 refusing to allot a flat to the petitioner and a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondent to allot an MIG flat in the ground or first floors in Dwarka Phase-I at the rates as prevalent in the year 1994; and b) Pass any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. It is the case of the petitioner in the writ petition that her husband Late Sh. Gurdial Singh had applied for allotment of MIG flat under the New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (NPRS-79) on September 25, 1979 vide registration Number 21090. At the time of submitting the application, Sh. Gurdial Singh was a resident of D-48, Fateh Nagar, New Delhi. It is aver....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rsement was made in the ration card stating "change of address made "20/5, Ashok Nagar, New Delhi - 110018". It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner submitted all the necessary documents including photocopy of the ration card where change of address had effected. Having satisfied that the petitioner is entitled for change of registration in her name, the respondent had carried out the change of registration in the name of the petitioner on October 15, 1990. According to her, as there was no communication from the respondent pursuant to the change of registration in her name and on learning from the Newspaper reports that the respondent DDA had almost completed allotment of MIG flats in Dwarka, she approached the respondent. It....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se of the petitioner was covered under the "wrong address policy" the competent authority had decided to allot a flat to the petitioner as in the meantime, the flat that was allotted to the petitioner was disposed off. Accordingly, the name of the petitioner was put in the draw held on May 18, 2007 for allotment of MIG flat and flat no. 65, First floor, Pocket-D, Phase-II, Dwarka, New Delhi was drawn in the name of the petitioner. While carrying out the computation, it appears that the Finance Department in its note dated July 19, 2007 had put an objection. After considering the objection put by the Finance Department and on a re-consideration, it was decided to call upon the petitioner to appear in the public hearing along with original ra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is not applicable and the approval earlier given may be withdrawn. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the non-allotment of the flat to the petitioner and withdrawal of the earlier decision on the basis that the case is not covered under the "wrong address policy" is absolutely illegal and without merit. 5. On the other hand, the case of the respondent is that husband of the petitioner late Sh. Gurdial Singh had applied for registration of MIG Flat under NPRS Scheme, 1979. He was the resident of D-48, Fateh Nagar, PS-Tilak Nagar, New Delhi - 110018. His death was intimated to the DDA and on the request of his wife, the registration was transferred in her name on October 15, 1990. It is also stated on turn of priority, the petiti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ot fall under the "wrong address policy". According to the respondent as the new address given by her is written differently; the affidavit has overwriting and the number of ration card of both the addresses are same, the impugned action is justified. Learned counsel for the petitioner would justify the cutting on the ration card by stating that as there was no change of Mandal and the shop as the petitioner has changed her residence within the same locality, i.e., 25/13, Ashok Nagar, New Delhi to 20/5, Ashok Nagar, New Delhi, the authority concerned had struck off the old address and put the new address and retained the old ration card. It is stated that petitioner's name on the affidavit was correctly typed in the main portion of the affi....