https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360426 A later office order could not retrospectively withdraw an executive car facility already applied for under the employer's existing policy, because the policy did not require Grade Pay of Rs. 8900/- and instead tied eligibility to the officer's DGM (M3a) status. The earlier grant of the facility, made after approval, was treated as a valid benefit rather than an oversight. The Delhi HC also relied on the service-protection principle reflected in Rule 6(7) of the Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001. The denial of the facility was set aside and the benefit was directed to be extended after completion of formalities. en-us Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 May 2018 05:54:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360426 A later office order could not retrospectively withdraw an executive car facility already applied for under the employer's existing policy, because the policy did not require Grade Pay of Rs. 8900/- and instead tied eligibility to the officer's DGM (M3a) status. The earlier grant of the facility, made after approval, was treated as a valid benefit rather than an oversight. The Delhi HC also relied on the service-protection principle reflected in Rule 6(7) of the Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001. The denial of the facility was set aside and the benefit was directed to be extended after completion of formalities. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360426