2016 (3) TMI 503

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....WITH MR CB GUPTA, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MR. RAHUL R DHOLAKIA, ADVOCATE, MR MANISH R. BHATT, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE, MR RUTVIJ OZA, APP ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Mr. Manish Bhatt, Senior Counsel appearing with Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt waives service of notice of Rule for respondent No.1, Mr. Rahul R. Dholakia, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Special Criminal Application No.58 of 2015 and submitted that while rejecting the aforesaid petition, this Court observed in para 26 as under: "[26] Now, the important aspect which is required to be noted at this stage is that the respondent No.1 has specifically stated on oath in the affidavit-in-reply submitted before this Court in para 13 on page 137 that in the event the petitioner o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 42 gunny bags and therefore the contention that if the copy of the documents lying in 42 gunny bags is not supplied to the petitioner then prejudice would be caused to the petitioner, is misconceived." 5. Learned counsel thereafter submitted that against the order passed by this Court, the applicant preferred SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. However, the said SLP was dismissed. In view of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the material produced on record, this Court is of the opinion that once the statement, under the instruction of the officer, was made before this Court by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and the same is also reiterated today during the course of hearing, respondent No.1 shall provide the copy of the documents lying in 42 gunny bags to the applicant on payment of requi....