https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325319 The court directed respondent No.1 to provide copies of documents in 42 gunny bags seized by the police and now with the Income-tax Department to the applicant for the pending trial. Despite previous commitments, the documents were not supplied, leading to the court's intervention. Respondent No.1 was ordered to provide the necessary documents upon payment of fees, allowing the applicant to inspect them before obtaining copies. The court emphasized that the order was case-specific, ensuring a fair defense opportunity without setting a precedent. The application was disposed of with the rule made absolute to the specified extent. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325319 The court directed respondent No.1 to provide copies of documents in 42 gunny bags seized by the police and now with the Income-tax Department to the applicant for the pending trial. Despite previous commitments, the documents were not supplied, leading to the court's intervention. Respondent No.1 was ordered to provide the necessary documents upon payment of fees, allowing the applicant to inspect them before obtaining copies. The court emphasized that the order was case-specific, ensuring a fair defense opportunity without setting a precedent. The application was disposed of with the rule made absolute to the specified extent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325319