2016 (3) TMI 502
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi ) These tax appeals were admitted for consideration of following common substantial questions of law : "TAX APPEAL NO.112 0f 2009 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 1996-97) (A) Whether the Appellate tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the reassessment order passed under Section147 was improper and required to be cancelled ? (B) Whether th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Assessing Officer to deduct indexed cost of acquisition from full value of sale consideration ? (C) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to allow long term capital loss of Rs. 3,27,082/- ? (D) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in not appreciating that the investment made in shares are held by the assessee as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by the judgement of Supreme Court in case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and another v. Hotel Blue Moon reported in (2010) 321 ITR 362 (SC). Though this judgement was rendered in the background of block assessment, nevertheless, it was observed that for any assessment under section 143(3) of the Act, notice under section 143(2) within the time limit would be essential. It was held that ....
TaxTMI