2016 (1) TMI 283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, being a dealer in Seamless & ERW boilers Tubes and assessee on the file of the 1st respondent herein, regularly submitting their monthly returns and paying taxes in accordance with law. For the assessment year 2011-12, the petitioner reported total and taxable turnover of Rs. 57,08,24,683/- and Rs. 55,83,56,981/- under the TNVAT Act. But, the 1st respondent determined total and taxable turnover of Rs. 56,24,83,490/- and Rs. 54,44,53,461/- and imposed tax and penalty by order dated 30.04.2015. Since the 1st respondent has not calculated the correct rate of tax, the petitioner approached the officer to correct the turnover and tax adjustments and payments. However, in the meantime, the 1s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resented on 19.08.2015 were returned by the 2nd respondent pointing out certain defects. After correcting the same, the petitioner re-presented the same on 27.08.2015. However, till date there is no progress. Hence, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner sent a representation through his counsel on 09.09.2015 and requested the 2nd respondent to list the case. Till date, there is no response. In the meantime, the 1st respondent issued bank attachment notice, without serving copy to the petitioner. That apart, according to him, when the petitioner represented before the 1st respondent about the attachment through letter dated 15.09.2015, the xerox copy of the bank attachment order dated 10.08.2015 was served on 18....