Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank attachment could be lifted on partial compliance with the disputed tax requirement, and whether the pending appeal should be heard and decided on merits.
Analysis: The assessment challenge had already been taken in appeal, and the appeal papers had been re-presented after rectification, but no effective consideration had taken place. In this situation, the Court accepted the request for a direction to the appellate authority and balanced the petitioner's grievance against the revenue's insistence on a further deposit by directing payment of 25% of the disputed tax, apart from the amount already deposited, as a condition for lifting the attachment. Upon proof of such payment, the attachment was to be withdrawn and the bank account made operable. The appellate authority was also directed to take up the appeal and decide it on merits after giving due opportunity.
Conclusion: The relief was granted in part in favour of the petitioner by ordering conditional release of the bank attachment and expeditious disposal of the appeal on merits.