TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (1) TMI 282
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv For the Respondent : Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana JUDGMENT Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. This order shall dispose of a bunch of 6 petitions bearing CWP Nos. 16215, 16229, 16248, 16252, 16323 and 18001 of 2015 as according to learned counsel for the parties, the issues involved herein are identical. For brevity, the facts are being extracted from CWP No. 180....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt. It purchases/acquires land for development, gets approval for the projects, its layout drawings etc. from the concerned authorities and then starts developing the project and also marketing the project. The petitioner is a works contractor working on behalf of prospective buyers who book flats/units in the projects being constructed/developed by the petitioner. The petitioner is discharging th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he customers towards transfer of undivided share in land. Thereafter, another circular dated 10.2.2014 replacing clause 3.1 of the circular dated 7.5.2013 was issued. Both the circulars are attached as Annexure P-4 (Colly) with the writ petition. The petitioner has opted for composition scheme and pays VAT @ 4.20% including surcharge on all the project related expenses. According to the petitioner....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the said notice nor raised the pleas as have been raised in the instant writ petitions before the competent authority. 7. At this stage, we do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the notice under challenge. However, we clarify that the proper course of action for the noticee is to file detailed and comprehensive objection/reply and to raise all the pleas as have been raised in the ....