Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

No VAT on brand franchisee fee without transfer of effective control over brand

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o VAT on brand franchisee fee without transfer of effective control over brand<br>By: - Bimal jain<br>Value Added Tax - VAT and CST<br>Dated:- 19-11-2015<br><br>No VAT on brand franchisee fee without transfer of effective control over brand State of Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. United Breweries Ltd. [2015 (11) TMI 754 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] United Breweries Limited ("the Respondent") being owner of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Kingfisher Brand entered into contracts with certain Contract Bottling Units ("CBUs") for manufacturing of beer. In terms of the contract: * The Respondent transferred know-how for manufacturing beer to CBUs which was on non-assignable, non-transferable and non-exclusive basis; * The CBUs manufactured beer as per the specifications given by the Respondent using his trade marks, names and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... logos and the entire production was made available to the Respondent; * The right to market, sell, distribute and package the beer remained under the supervision and control of the Respondent; * The CBUs neither had any right over the product, nor did they have any right to sell or exploit the beer so produced, nor fix any price of the product. The Respondent received payments from CBUs ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as &#39;brand franchise fees&#39; and paid Service tax on the same. However, the Assessing Officer levied Sales tax on such payments by treating these as royalty. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka held that it is settled law that Sales tax can't be attracted until effective control is transferred. Since CBUs did not get effective control over the brand name as such, it could not be considered a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s sale of intangible goods. It was further held that since the Respondent had already paid Service tax on the amount received as brand franchise fees, double taxation on same goods is not permissible.<br> Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals ....