2015 (10) TMI 493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icks etc. Raw material for the petitioner is 'fused magnesia'. Substantial quantity of raw material was being imported from Peoples Republic of China (for short 'China'). The petitioner states that M/s. Birla Periclase, a division of Indian Rayon and Industry Limited, Visakhapatnam had a unit at Nagpur, which manufactures 'sintered magnesia'. That company is said to have complained to the Additio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the duty is being levied. The respondents filed a counter affidavit, narrating the circumstances, under which the duty came to be imposed. It is stated that the representations made by various organizations opposing such duty are under consideration. It is no doubt competent for respondents 1 and 2 to choose the goods for levying the duty. The objective is to prote....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sure of factory of M/s. Birla Periclase (which was manufacturing "sintered magnesia") was a result of other factors as well as that of Chinese dumping of the product. (ii) Under the facts and circumstances of the case, the continuation of anti-dumping duty is not justified and the Authority recommends accordingly: (iii) After careful consideration of the entire matter, the Authority recommends r....