<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 493 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265218</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to the imposition of antidumping duty on imported raw material, fused magnesia, by respondents 1 and 2. The Court recognized the authority of respondents to levy duty to protect domestic industries but found that the closure of the complaining company&#039;s factory was not solely due to Chinese dumping. As a result, the 2nd respondent recommended the retrospective withdrawal of the antidumping duty, effective from 01.10.1999. The Court directed that no duty should be levied on the petitioner if the withdrawal order had been issued, and parties were instructed to await related civil appeals. The miscellaneous petition was disposed of without cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 493 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265218</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to the imposition of antidumping duty on imported raw material, fused magnesia, by respondents 1 and 2. The Court recognized the authority of respondents to levy duty to protect domestic industries but found that the closure of the complaining company&#039;s factory was not solely due to Chinese dumping. As a result, the 2nd respondent recommended the retrospective withdrawal of the antidumping duty, effective from 01.10.1999. The Court directed that no duty should be levied on the petitioner if the withdrawal order had been issued, and parties were instructed to await related civil appeals. The miscellaneous petition was disposed of without cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>