2015 (10) TMI 492
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by the respondent under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act bearing Company Petition No. 112 of 2002 is pending in the High Court at Calcutta. The plea for winding up is based upon just and equitable grounds. In the facts of the case, after hearing the parties the Court ordered that the shares of the company be valued by an approved auditor so that company would settle the dispute by p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hree orders were challenged by the appellant through an intra-court appeal before the Division Bench bearing Civil Appeal No. 266 of 2004. Ultimately that appeal was dismissed by an order dated 12.7.2004 and that order of the Division Bench is the subject matter of the present appeal. 2. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 17.3.2004 refers to an earlier order dated 7.5.2003 which record....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of the cost paid to the valuer by reimbursing the respondent herein for a sum of Rs. 12,900/-. As noted earlier the above order was modified partly on 29.3.2004 by adding a default clause in case the company failed to make the required payment and further by order dated 20.4.2004 the time for payment was fixed as - on or before 1.6.2004. The Division Bench noted the aforesaid relevant facts and ca....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI