Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (10) TMI 659

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted for hearing vide order dated 1st November, 2001 on the following substantial questions of law:- "A. Whether ITAT was correct in law in confirming the order of CIT(A) and thereby deleting the addition of Rs.4,47,052/- at the rate of 45% of salary on account of overhead and the addition of Rs.28,704/- made under the head other perquisites by the Assessing Officer? B. Whether the order of ITA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent had claimed that he was a resident but not an ordinary resident during the year under consideration and a letter dated 22nd March, 1993 along with other details were filed by the respondent- assessee. The assessment order mentions that salary payments were made in pounds and the income was shown in pounds, in the return, seized printouts and the settlement application. It records overtime, liv....