https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238204 The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision to delete certain additions made by the Assessing Officer but found the lack of evidence supporting the impugned additions to be a perverse order on facts. The ITAT's failure to consider the annexure enclosed by the assessing officer in the assessment order was noted. The court acknowledged the dismissal of previous appeals by the Revenue due to low tax effect and expressed difficulty in understanding the issues and facts presented in the appeal, leading to the disposal of the appeal without specific answers to the questions of law raised. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238204 The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision to delete certain additions made by the Assessing Officer but found the lack of evidence supporting the impugned additions to be a perverse order on facts. The ITAT's failure to consider the annexure enclosed by the assessing officer in the assessment order was noted. The court acknowledged the dismissal of previous appeals by the Revenue due to low tax effect and expressed difficulty in understanding the issues and facts presented in the appeal, leading to the disposal of the appeal without specific answers to the questions of law raised. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238204